GopValuesPete Hegseth
Secretary of Defense · TN
Family and the risk it carries
1 relative on record · 1 documented record
Connections on record
Lines mark a documented family relationship. Money ties name the donor, company, contract or filing a relative is documented in — a link to weigh, not proof of wrongdoing.
Records by relative
spouse · 1 documented record
Captured on November 10, 2026 from 1 public source: cnbc.com. Every item links to the filing, docket or report it came from. Nothing here is independently verified beyond that link, and a record can be appealed, sealed or corrected after capture.
A relative's company, contract or court filing is not proof of wrongdoing or of anyone's loyalty. It shows who stands to gain from the decisions the office makes, so voters can weigh it themselves. Every record links to the filing, docket or report behind it.
What they do
No description of the office yet.
Documented record
11 sourced records · checked 11/10/2026
Pending investigations (1)
Congressional inquiry into Special Government Employees (SGEs)
Senator Charles Grassley requested information from Secretary Hegseth regarding the use, compensation, and potential conflicts of interest of Special Government Employees (SGEs) at the Department of Defense from March 2023 to the present.
Court records (6)
Mark Kelly v. Pete Hegseth (D.C. Cir. Case 26-5070)
Civil suit challenging official actions of the Secretary of Defense. Appealed from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia; oral argument held May 7, 2026.
State of New Jersey v. U.S. Department of Defense (Case 1:25-cv-11816-IT)
Joint motion for entry of judgment in a case involving the Department of Defense and other federal agencies regarding grant terminations.
State of New York et al. v. U.S. Department of Defense (Case 25-1236)
Consolidated proceedings challenging government actions regarding congressionally authorized grants.
Campaign Legal Center v. U.S. Department of Justice et al. (Case 1:25-cv-00946)
Suit challenging federal voter registration requirements involving the Department of Defense.
Anthropic PBC v. U.S. Department of War, et al.
Summary judgment granted to plaintiff regarding the 'Hegseth Directive' and Supply Chain Designation; court found the administrative record justifying the ban on Anthropic products was insufficient.
Mark Kelly v. Pete Hegseth (26-5070)
Appeal filed by Pete Hegseth and Department of Defense officials regarding a decision from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
News reporting (1)
Reporting on 2025 annual financial disclosure
Financial disclosure reports indicate Secretary Hegseth holds at least $3.1 million in assets, including cash, retirement investments, and bitcoin, with one bank account holding over $1 million.
Stock trades (2)
2025 Annual Financial Disclosure
Reported at least $3.1 million in cash, retirement investments, and bitcoin; sold more than two dozen individual stocks in 2025.
Periodic Transaction Report (March 2025)
Sale of multiple stock holdings including Oracle Corp, IBM, Danaher Corp, and Costco Wholesale Corp.
Captured on November 10, 2026 from 8 public sources: cnbc.com, courtlistener.com, litigationtracker.law.georgetown.edu, brennancenter.org, campaignlegal.org, cases.justia.com, extapps2.oge.gov, grassley.senate.gov. Every item links to the filing, docket or report it came from. Nothing here is independently verified beyond that link, and a record can be appealed, sealed or corrected after capture.
Contributions come from Federal Election Commission filings. Court dockets come from PACER and court records, county filings from the recorder or clerk who holds them, and the rest from official records and published reporting. None of these records is proof of wrongdoing.
Net worth
Not disclosed yet
Disclosure year not recorded
Outside income
No outside income disclosed.
Largest holdings
No holdings disclosed.
Crypto holdings
No crypto holdings disclosed.
Licensing, royalties & business deals
No licensing or business deals disclosed.
Disclosed foreign ties
No foreign financial ties disclosed in the records reviewed.
Conflicts the public should see
No overlap between private holdings and public duties has been documented.